An Open Letter to Mrs. Bush

Dear Mrs. Bush,

When I was six years old, I hid behind a couch with my ears covered by my tiny hands. I sang “Somewhere over the Rainbow” to drown out the sound of my mother screaming as my stepfather beat her.  Black eyes, a busted lip–all were common to see on my mother’s face. Another night, I awoke realizing I needed to use the restroom.  I was so scared to run into my stepfather in the hallway that I chose to urinate in the bed. I slept in it all night.  The predominant feeling throughout my childhood was fear. Fear that my mother would die, fear that I would die… just fear.

We survived. I received counseling. The scars from my youth never faded.

This is why I chose to get involved in the Domestic Violence movement. I did not find a job on Career Builder; I sought out a shelter for this work. When I began my work at the shelter, it was due to a genuine care for victims and their experiences.

I left the field five years later. I left because I realized the domestic violence movement had been hijacked by the very organization I imagined was its greatest ally: the Florida Coalition against Domestic Violence (FCADV).

You, Mrs. Bush, have partnered with FCADV since the early 2000s. According to their last 990 filing, you sit on the Board of their Foundation. In 2003, your husband, then Governor, Jeb Bush signed House Bill 1099. This bill allowed the FCADV to attain control over all funding for the 42 certified Domestic Violence centers in Florida. Over the past two weeks, your husband has publicly referenced his and your work on domestic violence as he makes his bid for Presidency.

For this reason, I can no longer be silent.

Immediately after your husband signed House Bill 1099, a multitude of things began to change at our shelter and others. In 2005, our Children’s Licensed Mental Health Counselor (LMHC) left and was never replaced. Our shelter seemed to have decided the service was no longer necessary. In 2010, our Adult Licensed Mental Health Counselor (LMHC) was laid off and never replaced. Also in 2010, two members of our Board of Directors raised concerns about various issues, including the possible misappropriation of funds, blatant mistruths on the shelter’s 990s, and the fact that the Executive Director was rarely on-site. Since the shelter’s oversight was and still is the FCADV, those affected reached out to them, calling and expressing concerns.

The result? They were dismissed from the Board.

Our longstanding Board of Directors included fourteen members; today it has six. In 2010, a strategic planner came in to help the shelter create a more concrete and effective plan to meet shelter objectives. However, it seems he was dismissed when the Executive Director was unhappy or, rather, “unsatisfied” with his findings.

Among the findings? The lack of full time presence of the CEO (Executive Director).

In 2012, the three top administrators at the shelter received two raises in two months. With those raises, nearly 40% of the entire funds of the shelter paid (and still pays) the three top administrators, one of which is the Executive Director who is almost never on-site. No action has been taken regarding any of these facts because, as previously mentioned, their only oversight is the FCADV and they do not appear to be concerned, based upon their lack of response to clearly expressed, valid concerns.

Certified Florida domestic violence shelters are required to report their counseling hours to FCADV monthly and FCADV compiles the numbers. The FCADV boasts that its centers provided approximately 455,000 hours of counseling to victims of domestic violence in 2014.

I called every one of Florida’s 42 certified centers and all but three confirmed that they have no LMHC counselor on staff. Most of them clarified that while they did not have licensed counselors, they follow a “peer counseling” model, which allows for a much looser conception of what counts as counseling. At the shelter where I worked, each and every moment a staff member spoke to a victim counted toward counseling hours.

Internal memos signed by our director encouraged advocates to “get counseling hours up.” One specific memo (which I have in my possession) reads: “Do their nails, hair, gather them for a movie” … just get the hours up. I find it troubling that they consider this counseling. Had that been the counseling service I received as a child, or my mother received as an adult, I fear what would have become of us.

In 2009, the Department of Justice released their national fatality review on domestic violence victims. Among their findings were the following:

Up to 88% of battered women in shelters suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

The Mexico fatality review study documented that a third of the female victims had alcohol in their system at the time of autopsy, with a blood alcohol content of twice the legal limit.

Other studies have found that as many as 72% of abuse victims experience depression.

Among women treated in emergency rooms for injuries caused by their abusers, those who suffered from substance abuse had increased risk of violence from partners.

75% (of battered women in shelters) experience severe anxiety.

Another hospital study found that victims injured by partners were more likely than other injured women in an emergency room to test positive for substance abuse.

This is not about blaming victims; it is about establishing which services victims truly need. How did it come to be that FCADV would ignore the desperate need for mental health counseling and substance abuse help in your shelters and centers? How did it come to be that FCADV stopped providing those services?  The official word from FCADV is that, “It’s not one of our core services” and/or “We can’t assume that every victim needs those services.” If credible data demonstrates that 80% of women in shelters have PTSD, shame on FCADV for not helping them.  This is especially true when Executive Directors continue to receive raises while those in need struggle for resources. The FCADV claims they “refer out” for mental health services. But to what resources? Mental health and substance abuse are incredibly underfunded while the FCADV is not. When I worked at the shelter as an advocate, most referrals I was required to recommend involved month-long waiting lists.

The Empowerment Model looks good on paper but one cannot empower an individual to do “what’s best for herself or her children” when the individual needs sobriety, substance abuse counseling, or mental health care. Blatantly ignoring what statistics make clear is irresponsible, unethical, and, at best, ineffective.

I worked with at least 600 women in our shelter. How many had what the average person or shelter employee would consider a “happy ending” or beneficial outcome? I would wager that fifty is a more than generous guess. In my opinion, approximately fifty of 600 women left our shelter better off than when they arrived. The vast majority left almost no better from their time in our center. The reason is that, of the 600 women I worked with, roughly fifty dealt solely with domestic violence. The other 550 dealt with (and are likely still dealing with)co-traumas of substance abuse and/or mental health.

Our shelter sent them back out into the world with none of what they needed to stay safe. Where did they go? Sometimes we dropped them off behind a Publix to walk into the woods, sometimes at homeless shelters, sometimes back to their abusers, sometimes to different shelters.  Not one of the highest paid administrators who take home nearly 40% of the shelter’s funding demonstrated concern about the outcome of these survivors—or in this case, victims. I blame the FCADV.

I applaud the efforts of FCADV to raise awareness. I applaud their efforts to change the conversation and place the blame on abusers. I do NOT applaud their efforts to save lives because they are failing. And as long as they continue doing what they are doing—putting salaries above services and greed above goodwill—they will keep failing. Hiding behind the Empowerment Based Model does a disservice to victims, and that is not okay.

To empower women and victims, you must start by having honest conversations about the co-traumas that shelter workers see. The FCADV spends a great deal of money on lobbyists, to maintain their status quo. Domestic violence victims and survivors are not interested in the politics that have allowed this to spiral out of control, but it is certainly political in nature.

The FCADV has dwindled away needed services, such as mental health care, at its 42 centers, all while top executives and administrators continue to receive unjustified and unnecessary raises. It is unconscionable that the Executive Director of the FCADV makes nearly half a million dollars a year while victims go without essential services. Florida does not even come close to comparing to other Executive Director salaries.

I took the time to look at the 990’s for all State Coalition Executive Directors… here is how Florida’s Director compares:

clip_image002

Florida is often cited as leading the nation in domestic violence initiatives. I am terrified that other states would model themselves after ours. I cringe to think about what will become of the victims as executives’ pockets get bigger. I believe the FCADV began with good intentions. However, as often happens, when left unchecked, greed found its footing.

Please stop listening to the highest paid executives and go back to the basics. Speak openly with advocates, case managers, and all those who provide direct service.  Ask what they see, what services and resources they need to protect women, and to provide comfort and safety through their transition. You will find that the FCADV has gotten in the way of saving lives.

For too long, I stayed quiet. For too long, I tried to justify what I knew was wrong. For too long, I covered my ears like I did when I was a child hiding from the abuse in my own home. Now I will speak out. I will speak to State Representatives and individuals in Congress. I will reach out to others to join the fight. I will reach out with documentation of everything I have collected through my extensive research. I will never again let Mr. Jeb Bush go on TV and claim he has made positive changes to Florida’s domestic violence system. Perhaps you have both raised some important initiatives, but you have also helped the rich to get richer by ignoring the needs of victims.

Enough is enough.

Domestic violence survivors and victims in Florida deserve better. Every victim deserves better. It is time to take back the movement whose vast potential for change has been stolen by the FCADV. I sincerely hope you will consider my plea and use your position of power to benefit those in need rather than contributing to their further victimization.

Sincerely,

Cassandra
www.floridadvreform.com
dvindustryissues@gmail.com
www.facebook.com/FLDVReform
https://twitter.com/cassandra_dye

Feel free to repost this blog, link to it, and/or share. If sharing on Twitter, use #FloridaDVReform. You may also tweet it to Columba Bush and Jeb Bush.

Break the Silence

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “An Open Letter to Mrs. Bush

  1. It’s repulsive that in THIS industry there are power players with excessively high salaries, unfortunately even within a shelter, that think they bring about change and help. That shelters in Florida are run by minimum standards says it all.It’s bare minimum. And that anyone can think a victim/survivor wouldn’t benefit from a licensed counselor to process and heal the trauma and the wounds that develop from being abused….it’s ignorant. It comes down to the fat coin, the dollar bill that some want rather than to help for those in need. First comes awareness then change from those that actually give a damn.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Bravo! Thank you for saying in print what so many of us know is true. Her salary is obscene! I thought that after the fuss when it was 350,000 something would change but she’s had the nerve to add another 100k? And the legislature funnels all funds directly to FCADV. Even DCF funnels almost all grants directly to FCADV. Shameless.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Probably the CEO was a friend o recomended person of this Bush as it was the Fema Director when hurrican Katrina,friend or recomended of the other Bush.I do not want more Bushes managing the country.

    Like

  4. The Government does not regulate salaries other than minimum wage, the Executive Director’s salary is based on the work she does and the (non government) money she raises, which she is very good at. It is up to the individual donors to continue to give or not give based on where they want their money to go. FCADV, as all State Coalitions are, private non-profit organizations which means you really cannot blame the government for salary issues because they are a private non-government regulated organization. However, the state does assume responsibility for what funding they provide to FCADV as administrative and program related funds. There are also not many states that come anywhere close to having 42 Domestic Violence shelters under their Coalition’s thumb. FCADV has made huge efforts in Florida in providing victim services and ensuring the bills get written and put in place that help support victims and their families. Though, the government does offer emphasis on a particular focus they might want the coalitions to concentrate on as the issue arises on the Federal Level. That could be anywhere from Substance Abuse to Prevention, depending on what the media is covering that year. I do not think FCADV is to blame for the lack of specific care for victims (substance abuse in particular), they, like us, are subject to whatever funding is available and we take what we can get to at least provide emergency services. A lot of funding issues around the time you are speaking of, really is because of the war, recession, etc. and lots and lots of money has been pulled for these types of programs and the money that we are still getting is being scrutinized more and more. People with mental health and substance abuse issues across the country are suffering because of the laws (or lack of laws) that have come down from the federal government. Abuse victims or not, this particular group of citizens have been failed on a detrimental level. It is up to us, as the community, to stand up for them in all venues across the board. Only then can we hope things will change for them.

    Like

    • You raise some great points and I truly appreciate you expressing them. A few thing I’d like to reply to:

      You said: The Government does not regulate salaries other than minimum wage, the Executive Director’s salary is based on the work she does and the (non government) money she raises, which she is very good at.
      My response: Her salary is decided by her Board of Directors, that is what her official statement was in 2012 when Rick Scott brought this issue to light. Her Board of Directors are all Executive Directors of shelters within Florida. One member is the Executive Director of the shelter I’m addressing.

      You said: It is up to the individual donors to continue to give or not give based on where they want their money to go. FCADV, as all State Coalitions are, private non-profit organizations which means you really cannot blame the government for salary issues because they are a private non-government regulated organization. However, the state does assume responsibility for what funding they provide to FCADV as administrative and program related funds.

      My response: At this time, GOVERNMENT funding for Domestic Violence in funding is filtered through the FCADV. They do control the funding.

      You said: FCADV has made huge efforts in Florida in providing victim services and ensuring the bills get written and put in place that help support victims and their families.

      My response: They absolutely have. I applaud those changes.

      You said: I do not think FCADV is to blame for the lack of specific care for victims (substance abuse in particular), they, like us, are subject to whatever funding is available and we take what we can get to at least provide emergency services.
      My response: Not having the funding to meet the need is understandable. Ignoring the need is not ok. Pretending the need isn’t there, is not ok.

      You said: A lot of funding issues around the time you are speaking of, really is because of the war, recession, etc. and lots and lots of money has been pulled for these types of programs and the money that we are still getting is being scrutinized more and more.
      My response: I would agree with you, with exception to the raises that others obtained while eliminating necessary programs.

      You said: People with mental health and substance abuse issues across the country are suffering because of the laws (or lack of laws) that have come down from the federal government. Abuse victims or not, this particular group of citizens have been failed on a detrimental level. It is up to us, as the community, to stand up for them in all venues across the board. Only then can we hope things will change for them.

      My response: I agree.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s